The engines

Eight Independent Analytical Engines

Different evidence answers different questions. The public description is what each engine examines. The implementation stays private.

1. 01

   Media Forensics

   Examines measurable characteristics within digital media to identify relevant forensic evidence.

2. 02

   Forensic Coherence

   Evaluates whether independent observations are consistent, contradictory or inconclusive.

3. 03

   Evidence Aggregation

   Organizes observations from multiple analytical systems without reducing complex evidence to a single simplistic metric.

4. 04

   Policy

   Determines what the available evidence is allowed to support — and when the system must remain inconclusive.

5. 05

   Uncertainty

   Updates confidence as evidence arrives. Incomplete files stay uncertain. A probability is not a fact.

6. 06

   Behavioral Hesitation

   Looks for uncertainty in the story around the media. Hesitation is not guilt. Research architecture — human interpretation required.

7. 07

   Collective Judgment

   Considers whether agreement around a file appears independent. Consensus is not automatically treated as truth.

8. 08

   Adversarial Resistance

   Asks whether the decision-making environment itself can be trusted. We do not publish the methods.

Evidence. Uncertainty. Judgment. Governance.

• Evidence

  What can actually be measured?

• Coherence

  Do independent observations tell a compatible story?

• Uncertainty

  How strongly should the available evidence change confidence?

• Governance

  What is the system justified in saying?

A measurement should not automatically become an accusation. A probability should not become a fact. A consensus should not become truth.